Ron Paul has a better shot of Defeating Obama than Sarah Palin

As I pointed out earlier that in the Tea party it really boils down to two candidates: Ron Paul versus Sarah Palin.  Ultimately, this is Right versus Realistic.  Most people see that Ron Paul makes the right decision all of the time and is actually the better representative candidate, but most will fall for the idiocy of the realism argument.  For more on that read the article.

According to Rasmussen Reports, Ron Paul is better suited to take on Obama than Sarah Palin.  This is obvious as she has absolutely no charisma on the debate floor.  Paul Joseph Watson puts it like this, “if the Republicans go with Palin, Obama’s second term is virtually guaranteed. Numerous interviews have highlighted the fact that Palin has little grasp of any policy issues and is a poor public speaker in a debate context. It was only a few months ago that she made another faux pas in claiming that North Korea was a U.S. ally.”

For further reading:

Romney, Huckabee Even with Obama, Other GOP Hopefuls Trail

Sarah Palin Mistakenly Calls N. Korea an “Ally”

Sarah Palin Is No Ronald Reagan

~ by Majestic on February 8, 2011.

One Response to “Ron Paul has a better shot of Defeating Obama than Sarah Palin”

  1. Hey! Lorem ipsum blog peppod et firmiter usque foras vasa tua plus. EGO iustus added vos ut meus Google Lector feed. Nullam in. Vultus porro ut lectio magis vobis in posterus.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: